I was reading this blog post and was intrigued. Since I’d recently grabbed a 1st quarter 2007 financial summary, I thought I’d play with the numbers like Lew did. Click here for the chart he cited – it’s the second to last item on the page. He goes on to compare those numbers to some data on conversions (interesting stuff) and there’s a whole other aspect I’m mulling over, besides. But I’m just playing with the budget tonight. No deep stuff right now. *smile*
My church is having a bit of a crisis – our senior pastor resigned “in disgrace,” I guess you’d call it, last September. At the end of 2006, giving and expenses pretty much matched. That seems like a pretty good thing given the circumstances. But the first quarter of 2007 did not go as well – there is a deficit. Anyway, I did the groupings for both the budgeted amount and the actuals (guessing as best I could on what some things meant). For Good Works, I included all the in house ministries as well as missions and community outreach. Here’s what I came up with:
Budgeted: Actual spending:
50.2% – Payroll 53.4% – Payroll
29.5% – Structure Costs 30.0% – Structure Costs
20.3% – Good Works 16.6% – Good Works
This is interesting to me because in almost every line item, they are running under budget, including payroll. But looking at the percentages is a bit alarming – as giving has gone down, less goes to Good Works and more goes to Payroll. Overall, though, it looks like the church’s budget is pretty much average.
One thing I love about this church is it’s emphasis on cheerful giving and cheerful service. They don’t talk about money very often – and they never beg or ask for pledges or anything and I’ve always liked that. I wonder if it’s been difficult for them to even bring up the deficit to the congregation – I have a feeling it is, but if they aren’t open, how will we know there’s a need? I like being given the facts (like they recently did) so that I can know. I can figure out what to do without a guilt trip.